Skip to content
WallpaperLIFT
The Great Carina Nebula by P-J

The Great Carina Nebula, full screen

The Great Carina Nebula by P-J

  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 320x480
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

No match

The Great Carina Nebula

By P-J

Follow
No downloads
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 320x480
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

No match

Public domain image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope.

About the photo

Adobe Photoshop.

Contact the artist

Loading…

Comments (29)

  1. Animus

    I'm alarmed by the amount of negative comments here, and the arbitrary reasoning behind them. Beauty, art, even originality are subjective and dependent on one's focus. This image appeals to me BECAUSE of it's retouching - the constricted tonal range paired with its sheer "busyness" creates an intense and immediate impact that dwarfs the senses and prevents one from "taking it all in," which I find an appropriate sensation to have when scanning the heavens. It looks absolutely magnificent as a background on my black and aluminum MacBook Pro, and I have gotten many compliments on it.

    Reply

  2. stubulman

    Alant's comment, "I think there are too many stars..." reminds of a line straight out of the motion picture, Amadeus, where Mozart's rival, Salieri, convinces the Emperor to complain to Mozart that the piece that Mozart has just performed contained "too many notes." Mozart, a bit flabbergasted, retorts that the piece has just the right amount of notes--not too many and none too few. I suppose the heavens don't alway cooperate when we want them too!

    Reply

  3. stubulman

    P-J, I do appreciate the work that you invested in retouching the NASA image. That you credited the originator of the photo is of course not only a courtesy but an absolute necessity. I am glad you did so. However my reservation is that the work shown on these pages is basically a reflection of the imagination and creativity of those who submit images--both photographic, hand-drawn, or digitally conceived. This is my subjective judgement of the content that IFL accepts or should accept. For example, I could artfully retouch a photo by Ansel Adams, Alfred Stieglitz and so on but would not submit them out of respect for the authors. If you measure the praise garnered by Chris Gin or Macindows, I think my point is made. Originality is highly valued. If you and others disagree, so be it. I don't consider myself the arbiter of what is right--I just have (for what it's worth) an opinion. All the best.

    Reply

  4. darksnow

    Personally I think these are great. If I were experienced at all with photoshop I would probably do them myself. I always enjoy space wallpapers, but its always been difficult to find some really great ones. What you do just raises the bar, even if you don't take the pictures yourself. Please keep up the good work! :P

    Reply

  5. P-J

    stubulman > of course I haven't took this picture , that why there's credits , but don't you think that the creator should be happy to see is photo retouched ? do we retouch uninteresting photos ? All the honors are for the persons who takes the photo , we could say that I'm just a spectator and you're true , one day I'll create photo by myself , but where is the problem if they are crédits ?

    Reply

  6. P-J

    I'm creative but , it's difficult to find something pleasant for the user , and I've found a NASA picture wich is , I think an interesting picture , I hope you'll see this on this website and you'll change you mind , and I admit that I should create my own photos but I've decided to start with those one because they're unusual ( besides I haven't got a reflex yet ^^ )

    Reply

  7. stubulman

    Bojan, I haven't commented on the NASA photo postings before because of the overwhelmingly positive response. I too feel that their being here is just shy of the intent of this site. Retouching a Michelangelo may be an art in and of itself, but in the end you are standing on the shoulders of the creator.

    Reply

This is for artists

Sign up Log in

From the InterfaceLIFT archive

InterfaceLIFT.com was a wallpaper community, from 2003 to about 2018. When it closed, its wallpapers stayed in the public Internet Archive (opens in a new tab), and this one was preserved from there.

It is credited to its original artist and keeps its original publish date.

Are you the artist or the rights holder, and don’t want it here? Request its removal.

Are you the artist or the rights holder, and don’t want it here? Request its removal.

Sizes