Skip to content
WallpaperLIFT
The Grand Central by Lowe Rehnberg

The Grand Central, full screen

The Grand Central by Lowe Rehnberg

  • 2560x1600
  • 2304x1440
  • 2048x1280
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1152x720
  • 2560x1440
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1600x900
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 2560x1024
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 640x960
  • 320x480
  • 1024x1024
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

No match

The Grand Central

By Lowe Rehnberg

Follow
No downloads
  • 2560x1600
  • 2304x1440
  • 2048x1280
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1152x720
  • 2560x1440
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1600x900
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 2560x1024
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 640x960
  • 320x480
  • 1024x1024
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

No match

A classic photo of the magnificent Grand Central Terminal, New York City.

About the photo

Canon EOS 500D.

Photo settings: 10 mm.

More by Lowe Rehnberg

Under the Glowing Sky by Lowe Rehnberg
Under the Glowing Sky
0
Lone Rock by Lowe Rehnberg
Lone Rock
0
Fire Beach by Lowe Rehnberg
Fire Beach
0
God's Cottage by Lowe Rehnberg
God's Cottage
0
Geiranger at Night by Lowe Rehnberg
Geiranger at Night
0
Deep Blue Night by Lowe Rehnberg
Deep Blue Night
0
Calmness by Lowe Rehnberg
Calmness
0
End of the Fjord by Lowe Rehnberg
End of the Fjord
0
Valley House II by Lowe Rehnberg
Valley House II
0
Peeking Sun by Lowe Rehnberg
Peeking Sun
0

Contact the artist

Loading…

Comments (24)

  1. dirtyvu

    great color and sharpness. the hdr is not overdone. you can easily fix the ghosting problem due to multiple exposures in photoshop. put the hdr image on top, create a layer mask, and peel off the ghost to reveal the clean underneath image. it won't affect the image and if you're careful about it, no one will ever know.

    Reply

  2. Woofa

    The notion of shooting an empty GCS is ridiculous, why remove people from a shot when that is what GCS is about. Also showing them completely still doesn't convey the idea that nobody hangs around in there for the most part, they are quickly moving through. The way the people look in this shows the activity. firefly.serenity is exactly right. onis_uk there is no such thing as an error when your intent is the outcome.

    Reply

  3. RussJones

    I have to weigh in on the side of the "I like the people in the shot" folks. That's one of the busiest rooms on the planet, it's literally never empty, and I think this picture captures it. I also like that it's in color. I've seen a many different versions of this same basic shot, some dating back to the earliest days of Grand Central, and they're almost always in black and white, or sepia, or the color's very muted. But the color here just adds to the vitality. Thanks, lrehnberg, for a very satisfying shot! Russ

    Reply

  4. firefly.serenity

    What some people don't get is that IFL is a wallpaper website, not a photography website. There is always someone who points out "errors" in submissions as if to suggest that only perfect, ultra-realistic photographs are the only thing that should make it to the top. Now, I have only been here for a few years, but there have been plenty of submissions that were not photographs at all, and those have garnered community-based critical acclaim. Let's look at IFL as it should be - a great website offering some of the best computer wallpapers that exist on the Internet - but not a "capture-real-life-as-best-you-can" website. This submission is very artistic, and pretty much the *exclusive* reason that I like it so much is because it is different from reality. IMO, it is a near-perfect capture of life at Grand Central Terminal. Just because this is different than what you can see with your eyes in real life does not make it "wrong" or as having "multiple faults." Almost every submission I have ever seen on IFL has been doctored, cleaned up or otherwise digitally altered in some way. This alteration, by definition, makes the pieces "art." We should critique them as such.

    Reply

  5. firefly.serenity

    No, no, no. This is wild. I grew up in Manhattan, and this is exactly the way that GCT should look. The people whizz by and they leave pretty much as soon as they enter. This is and incredible effect, and if it was done intentionally, leaves my jaw on the floor. This is the epitome of a "capture." This is still life, NYC-style - there is no such as "still" life.

    Reply

  6. Philippe Clairo

    I also like this photo, because of the colours and contrast. For me the people don't spoil it that much, but it could have been maybe a little bit nicer with them blurred. You should try a long exposure like Patrick above suggests, and also, do some reading about chromatic aberration. It might not be an issue at a smaller size, but when your shots end up on a 27" monitor, it is very visible! In all, congrats, and I like the urban scene, a nice change compared to the usual wilderness!

    Reply

This is for artists

Sign up Log in

From the InterfaceLIFT archive

InterfaceLIFT.com was a wallpaper community, from 2003 to about 2018. When it closed, its wallpapers stayed in the public Internet Archive (opens in a new tab), and this one was preserved from there.

It is credited to its original artist and keeps its original publish date.

Are you the artist or the rights holder, and don’t want it here? Request its removal.

Are you the artist or the rights holder, and don’t want it here? Request its removal.

Sizes