Lacustrine
- Widescreen 16:10
- 3840x2400
- 3360x2100
- 2880x1800
- 2560x1600
- 2304x1440
- 2048x1280
- 1920x1200
- 1680x1050
- 1440x900
- 1280x800
- 1152x720
- 1024x640
- Widescreen 16:9
- 3840x2160 - 4k UHDTV
- 2880x1620
- 2560x1440
- 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
- 1600x900
- 1366x768
- 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
- Dual monitors
- 2560x1024
- Fullscreen 4:3
- 1600x1200
- 1400x1050
- 1280x960
- 1024x768
- Fullscreen 5:4
- 1280x1024
- Netbook
- 1024x600
- 800x480
- iPhone
- 640x1136
- 640x960
- 320x480
- iPad
- 2048x2048
- 1024x1024
- Android
- 1920x1408
- 1440x1280
- 1080x960
- 960x854
- 960x800
- 600x1024
- 640x480
- BlackBerry
- 360x480
- 320x240
- Windows Phone
- 768x1280
- 720x1280
- 480x800
- Other
- 960x544
- 480x272
- 320x400
No match
Shot taken at Gheraiesti Park, Bacau city, Romania.
About the photo
Canon EOS Rebel T3i, Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6.
Photo settings: 21 mm, f/3, 1/250 second, ISO 100.
Comments (3)
-
mightyfletch
This image is very crisp. In capturing landscape, it is necessary to have a wide depth of field, or else the background, or either foreground for that matter, would be out of focus. The colors are quite vivid as well. The polarization filter allows you to see under the water...genius.
-
InfDcoD
Although I do not know very much about photography and so I can not say anything about the previous comment I could not notice that the landscape is spelendid and special. Congratulations for the photographer.
-
brizkit
Much as I love the scenery and coloration here, I think the HDR actually hurts this photo. There just doesn't seem to be much depth of field, giving the image a "flat" and even claustrophobic sense (in my humble internet opinion, of course). That said, it's a really lovely looking place, and the detail you captured in the rocks and flora is impressive. I would love see a non-HDR version, though!