In My Eyes
- Écran large 16:10
- 1920x1200
- 1680x1050
- 1440x900
- 1280x800
- Écran large 16:9
- 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
- 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
- Plein écran 4:3
- 1600x1200
- 1400x1050
- 1280x960
- 1024x768
- Plein écran 5:4
- 1280x1024
- iPhone
- 640x960
- 320x480
- BlackBerry
- 320x240
- Autre
- 480x272
Aucun résultat
Its a horse looking at some lines, basically - oh yeah there are some stars too and some dusty stuff - the horse probably wonders what is going on. Not to worry though, he's going to the glue factory soon anyway.
Ce fond d’écran est décrit en Anglais : les artistes écrivent dans leur propre langue, et nous ne traduisons pas leurs mots.
Fonds d’écran similaires
Commentaires (36)
-
Keonali
I like this image. I thought this was supposed to be a wallpaper site. And personally, IM SORRY but we do need more than a bunch of shots of barns :S I want something different and not a frickin mountain okay? Not everyone likes the nature shots ALL THE TIME and I LIKE THIS IMAGE A LOT! GAAAWWWDDDD Grrrrr angry face! Everyone has different tastes.
-
Anonymous
Wow. You people are terrible. =] jpicard _ wi.rr.com, I hope you're never a parent. When little Suzy comes home with her first 5 year olds rendition of a horse are you going to tell her it should never have seen the light of day. I'm a firm believe in "if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all." Maybe if more people practiced this we would live in a world full on confident, smart, and outgoing people. And in defense of the artist's comments; Haven't you ever doodled? Digitally or otherwise, and decided to share it? If it's a doodle, and not their life work, maybe a humorous and light hearted description is absolutely appropriate.
-
Anonymous
I thought that Interfacelift had professionalism! Simply this pic should never see the light of day (SICK)
-
Anonymous
you are distgusting and insensitive to be so crude about the photo.it would be more acceptable without that extra comment about the glue factory.
-
Anonymous
this is currently my desktop but i cut out the horse. it actually looks pretty cool to have sparks coming from a corner of the screen.
-
Anonymous
Ah, don't worry about it. I'll give you a positive. That should put you at -6. Just a little more campaigning and you'll be back to 0!!!
-
Anonymous
WOW!! :) Clearly I was having a bad hair day. Apologies for sparking such controversy with my lame humorless comment. Jeez. Negative 7 approval rating. I feel like a politician.
-
Anonymous
BIG SIGH....... Geez people, let this die already. Ccrisis, people that disagree with the comments above are not twits. Grow up. If no comments had been included with the image it would still have been a mediocre image. You are correct that there have been much worse images posted on InterfaceLift(a certain digitally composited view out of a curtained window comes to mind), however, that doesn't make this one any better. Personally, I don't find the comments funny but I'm not offended by them either. I simply don't like the image. Cripes, I've got plenty of my own images that I don't like either, but I don't post them online. This has been blown WAY out of proportion.
-
Anonymous
lol bad or not, I'd say the people approving pics here have a sense of humor. I've seen much worse stuff than this here, people just didn't like the comment. bunch of twits.
-
Anonymous
Like "AdamP" and several other, i also started to come here frequently because of the unbelievable shots we can find here, and considering all the work i've saw here in the past, this one is not as bad as some people here says.. (believe me, you can find alot worse here) I personnaly prefer a picture than a vector based wallpaper, but considering the kind of thecniques you used where, i say its not bad at all. ___________________________________________ "Art is subjective, so all artists must be prepared to recieve all kinds of critics"
-
titi
For a digitally-manipulated picture, this is pretty good, the description is hilarious, & thanks for smolamj's equine expertise too. My son (a lifelong, committed, vegetarian smart-arse) agrees with me, you made our day ;)
-
Anonymous
AdamP, why not worry about the way you create YOUR art instead of telling people how they should create theirs? If you don't like it you should just ignore it, or give some constructive criticism instead of just spouting off about landscapes and other subjects already heavily explored on this site. One wallpaper isn't going to destroy the "reputation" of IFL, so everyone should lay off and go look at art they actually enjoy if they are so bothered by this piece.
-
Anonymous
It's just a wallpaper. Dude you'd fire people over a wallpaper you don't like? Like how ridiculous is that? What can I say... I'm glad you're not my boss...
-
Anonymous
Nah its okay... your right.. just dont forget that art in all aspects is personal experience. Who knows how much thought and effort went into this image... It could be the highest form of art for the creator.... (doubt it... but hey)
-
Clearly the product of a warped and creative mind. We need more people like this to save us from your holiday snaps! I like the detail in the eye. Look up this phrase detracters: 'tongue in cheek'.
-
Anonymous
This image sucks. Whoever approved it should be fired!! NOW!!
-
I like digital art. I really do. I create quite a bit of it. But my point was this: The IFL website seems to promote, as do many of its contributing members, that this is a place for a slightly higher form of art than you can find on other websites. Something that if you made a print of and framed it, an average adult might enjoy hanging in their living room. I wasn't by any means saying all submissions must be limited to the categories I described above, but rather trying to push people to explore something outside their computer room. Get out with a camera, think about your composition, and take some pictures. Use post-processing to enhance the look and feel of the image, not create it. It's the artists who do as I prescribed that are able to create a visceral, emotional response to their pictures. This isn't a debate forum. I'm not going to carry this on any further. If you're still angry, email me.
-
Anonymous
"This image really does absolutely nothing for me. The description... whatever, it's neither funny nor offensive. Where are the breathtaking landscapes? The abandoned buildings? The interesting perspectives? This one honestly reminds me of a doodle from a Jr. High girl's notebook. I started coming to this site because of the amazing photographic skills of its submitting members. Lately there has been little to keep me coming back. There is rarely a need for computer rendered sparkle effects. Not every photograph has to be HDR to be good. Good design - concept, composition and execution - should trump photoshop effects and glitter." And the world is how small?? you?? You know there is more then one person on this planet... Some of those persons like photoshop effect and glitter. Wheter YOU like it or not! Its bullcrap that only the photo's you describe can be used or are worth using.. well you can deside.. but only for you.
-
Anonymous
I think it's quite creative but a bit gay looking. The artists comment was funny as well, considering the comments here. LOL @ Erik Schlange "Who at IFL approved this?" pffff
-
Anonymous
Look, people, if you will read MY comments closely you will notice that I don't make any reference to the stupid horse. My comments address the fact that the artist isn't taking their own work seriously. The comment "its a horse looking at some lines, basically - oh yeah there are some stars too and some dusty stuff" pretty much shows that they don't take this very seriously. Well, in my opinion, an already mediocre image becomes even more meaningless when even the artist doesn't care. I don't give a rip about the stupid horse or the inane comment about it becoming glue. InterfaceLift has higher standards for submissions than do many sites and seeing an image that, in my opinion, shouldn't ever see the light of day is annoying.