Moraine Lake Panorama
Par lucasjungmann
- Écran large 16:10
- 2560x1600
- 2304x1440
- 2048x1280
- 1920x1200
- 1680x1050
- 1440x900
- 1280x800
- 1152x720
- Écran large 16:9
- 2560x1440
- 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
- 1600x900
- 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
- Deux moniteurs
- 2560x1024
- Plein écran 4:3
- 1600x1200
- 1400x1050
- 1280x960
- 1024x768
- Plein écran 5:4
- 1280x1024
- Netbook
- 1024x600
- 800x480
- iPhone
- 640x960
- 320x480
- iPad
- 1024x1024
- Android
- 960x854
- 960x800
- 640x480
- BlackBerry
- 320x240
- Autre
- 480x272
Aucun résultat
9-shot bracketing, 6-frame panorama, totaling 54 exposures. Combined in Photomatix and then merged in Adobe Photoshop CS5. Final color corrections in Adobe Lightroom 3 and sharpening and resizing in CS5 with the Kenko Polarizing filter.
Ce fond d’écran est décrit en Anglais : les artistes écrivent dans leur propre langue, et nous ne traduisons pas leurs mots.
À propos de la photo
Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Photoshop, Photomatix.
Nikon D300S, AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED at 17mm and ISO 100.
Réglages de la photo : 17 mm, f/2, ISO 100.
Fonds d’écran similaires
Autres fonds d’écran de lucasjungmann
Commentaires (37)
-
Before I read the description, I honestly did not believe this was a real photo. I thought it was completely computer generated, everything was too sharp and in focus. Wow....this is some real technical achievements with the camera and Photoshop. Amazing quality. The blue sky is around the mountains is a little offset in color but just barely, and the woods at the base of the mountain or cliff look the most computer generated. Other than that, nothing wrong.
-
scarbies
Simply. AMAZING.
-
JFoleyDesigns
Hey Dewey nice shot! A lot has already been said but I'll throw my two cents in as well. I think the image is only a few steps away from greatness. First the photostitch - If you can just get them stitched so the sky doesn't have discoloration by the rear peak on the left and the craggy peak on the right, I'd be appeased. Second the composition - Your correct aspect ratio is much better but I'd like to see more sky to give the mountains some breathing room. If that's not possible I agree with Whitedog's cropping comment. Lastly, and the easiest, is color correction - The only thing I really find unsettling about the image is the tone of the sky and the overall saturation. If you could bring down the red tones of the sky so it is a more natural blue and less purple the image would feel less cold and alien. Also, all the colors are a bit too vibrant for me, but that's debatable. Regardless, great work! I look forward to seeing more
-
artist-54355
Thanks Dewey, 17484August-Edit.jpg made it for me. There's nothing refreshier than a bath in a cold mountainlake on a hot hiking day (and a beer afterwards ;) ).
-
Xinthose
anyone for a dip?? I like this picture because it just makes me want to jump in, swim, and just enjoy all of God's beautiful creation!!
-
vicentes
great shot!
-
ile-de-M
Canada is SO FREAKING BEAUTIFUL! sorry, just gotta say that :) great shot! my new wallpaper :)
-
only4now
good grief... everyone is such a critic... really nice picture dewey! i was hoping this made it off the Loupe :o)
-
Abrosious
The original you posted in your comments is much more pleasant to look at. Doesn't even have the "dust-on-the-lens" that Clyde mentioned. Personally I don't think it's dust, but more of a negative effect of all the filters/editing-software/enhancers it's gone through. A kind of "stress" mark on the photograph so to speak.
-
exeeman
Dude, this shot is awesome, I really hope I could live there.
-
Angela16
This image is a great try and I applaud you for your efforts. I see what the artist is trying to do but I think WbiteDog made a great comment about how your tools can get in the way. I hope you keep submitting Dewey 2999, learn from every photograph. With scenery like this around your stuff will be golden. On another note, sometimes I like the overly exaggerated colors, but the halos on the mountains is the biggest turn off.
-
Bosque
I think the picture is amazing & I would imagine that Dewey enjoyed making it. I think a good read about constructive criticism is needed by some that have posted.
-
Paradiddle
I believe I was very drawn to this picture precisely because of its unnatural 'over-processed' look. It has a beautifully distinct luster to it that makes me feel like I'm seeing more beauty than I would if I were there in person. Great work!
-
WhiteDog
I agree with Vex. I found plenty to criticize in the picture but I saw no reason to malign those who enjoy it. Doing so would only have detracted from my own credibility, such as it is. This is not some high-toned, high stakes art contest. It is a sharing web site where people submit their work for their own satisfaction and the occasional pleasure of others. Constructive criticism is appropriate. Ad homonym put downs are not.
-
Vex
Awesome! You must be worked so hard for this! @Clyde: I don't care if you are so professional and try to catch every single mistake someone made, but don't mock the people who just like to enjoy pictures as they see. "Those who see this as a work of art are easily impressed by shiny things"? If you are an adult, you should be ashamed saying like that.
-
i see lots of bad halos there....
-
Clyde
As this will obviously get deleted, I'll just call it as I see it. A mess. The left side of the picture shows obvious signs of dust on the lens/sensor. Pretty easy to remove with all the software you were using. How could you miss it ? The colours are frightening. I only ask why ? The HDR is so overdone the whole thing looks like one of those velvet paintings you win at the fair. You had everything at your disoposal. The scene, the equipment, the weather...how could the final shot end up like this ? Those who see this as a work of art are easily impressed by shiny things.
-
stubulman
"...raising the horizon line so that the weight of the water and the mountains would not balance so equally." @WhiteDog, this is my major complaint. My eye is drawn to the milky water, not the subject mountain. I may fiddle with the water to make it more reflective. I was expecting a crystal clear body of water even though that is not what nature provided.
-
WhiteDog
This image had a lot of potential. But there are some serious stitching problems, as TME said. And the sky in particular is over-processed, looking incredibly unnatural. Likewise, the tops of the mountains are too dark. This was an ambitious project and I applaud you for the effort. But I think you need to return to the drawing board and see if you can improve the image stitching. Perhaps you should skip Photomatix and use Photoshop for the HDR processing and the image stitching; you might get a more consistent result. And skip the polarizing filter effect altogether. It's a bright, sunny day near noon; the sky should be pale blue and the clouds should be fleecy white. Also, with so many photos to work from, their should have been more sky available at the top so the mountains don't crowd the edge so closely. Alternatively, you could crop a little of the top of the peak on the left so that it would break the frame of the image and serve to draw the eye into the picture. This would have the added advantage of raising the horizon line so that the weight of the water and the mountains would not balance so equally. This would improve the overall composition. I realize you are enjoying working with some new tools; but don't let the tools get in the way of the art. They are, after all, only tools. It's the end result that counts. Your tools and processing should be invisible. As a rule, if you can tell an image was processed, it's usually been over done.
-
precalc2
unbelievable shot