Skip to content
WallpaperLIFT
Aqueous by hameed

Aqueous, full screen

Aqueous by hameed

  • 2560x1600
  • 2304x1440
  • 2048x1280
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1152x720
  • 2560x1440
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1600x900
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 3840x1200
  • 3200x1200
  • 3360x1050
  • 2560x1024
  • 2880x900
  • 3840x960
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 640x960
  • 320x480
  • 1024x1024
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

No match

Aqueous

By hameed

Follow
No downloads
  • 2560x1600
  • 2304x1440
  • 2048x1280
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1152x720
  • 2560x1440
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1600x900
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 3840x1200
  • 3200x1200
  • 3360x1050
  • 2560x1024
  • 2880x900
  • 3840x960
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 640x960
  • 320x480
  • 1024x1024
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

No match

Water, its the stuff of life.

About the photo

Adobe Photoshop.

More by hameed

Origins by hameed
Origins
0
The Cube by hameed
The Cube
0
Escape by hameed
Escape
0

Contact the artist

Loading…

Comments (20)

  1. WhiteDog

    I suspect the "noise" is supposed to be ice crystals in the atmosphere that might also account for the rainbow. I didn't notice it at first - the scene seemed cold and dead and I wondered about the tag line regarding water being the stuff of life. But the crystals are swirling, further suggesting atmospheric winds of some kind. There is certainly a tension between the seemingly static ice on the surface and the agitation above it. It's a stunning image, however we may quibble about the reality of it. I'm afraid I agree, though: The rainbow is gratuitous, not to say incongruous. As for Photoshop CS 5, it's awesome; I want it, but cannot afford it. Bummer.

    Reply

  2. josephwm

    No, there should be no moisture given off by the melted ice. While this may be over-analysing, since we can see the stars and the planets in the picture so easily, it would strongly suggest that there is little or no atmosphere. This means that any ice warmed up by thermal radiation or a solar source would effectively sublime (turn straight to a gas), and therefore there is no moisture to produce such a rainbow. FYI, ice does not necessarily melt faster due to a thinner atmosphere, it is only the boiling point that changes. What you have instead of rainbows are things like ice halos, and sun-dogs, which happen a lot in places like Antarctica. I have colleagues that travel there for research, and they bring back some interesting photography showing the phenomenon. Indeed, see this photo from the wiki page for a nice example: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Sun_halo_optical_phenomenon_edit.jpg I do love this picture though!

    Reply

  3. Marden

    Actually I think the whole rainbow effect is for a reason, given that it is above ice, would it be too much to assume that the moisture given off of the melted ice (due the thinner atmosphere ice may melt faster) there may be a rainbow? This is just my science fiction writer mind at work, if you disagree, no problem that's fine. Just a hypothesis about it.

    Reply

  4. Tim H.

    Whoa. I normally do not like digital rendering at all because I normally only like real photographs, but again: WHOA! I sat here staring at this for a very long time. I really love how realistic this looks!! Very well done, man! Very! Unfortunately, I agree that this might be even better without the rainbow. I think that it's because the rainbow is making me examine the image for reasons why it's there. But I think that if the rainbow were removed and if that new version were compared to the original, then I suppose that I might end up preferring the original. However, it's a tough call without actually having such a comparison in front of me. Although, I can't deny that the rainbow feels very out of place. It feels like a rainbow doesn't belong in this environment (or perhaps can't exist). But if it weren't there, then I think that I would want something else there to fill that space - perhaps a smaller planet or a moon. Or maybe a comet or something else that we might encounter in outer space.

    Reply

  5. Igor Borisenko Photography

    I wasn't thinking about removing the rainbow but I sort of agree after test driving Adobe CS5 with it's content aware fill and delete that rainbow is history and it does make this wallpaper even better! Man do I love CS5 or what? I am in love :)

    Reply

This is for artists

Sign up Log in

From the InterfaceLIFT archive

InterfaceLIFT.com was a wallpaper community, from 2003 to about 2018. When it closed, its wallpapers stayed in the public Internet Archive (opens in a new tab), and this one was preserved from there.

It is credited to its original artist and keeps its original publish date.

Are you the artist or the rights holder, and don’t want it here? Request its removal.

Are you the artist or the rights holder, and don’t want it here? Request its removal.

Sizes