Ochoco Rainbow
- Widescreen 16:10
- 2560x1600
- 2304x1440
- 2048x1280
- 1920x1200
- 1680x1050
- 1440x900
- 1280x800
- 1152x720
- Widescreen 16:9
- 2560x1440
- 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
- 1600x900
- 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
- Dual monitors
- 2560x1024
- Fullscreen 4:3
- 1600x1200
- 1400x1050
- 1280x960
- 1024x768
- Fullscreen 5:4
- 1280x1024
- Netbook
- 1024x600
- 800x480
- iPhone
- 640x960
- 320x480
- iPad
- 1024x1024
- BlackBerry
- 320x240
- Other
- 480x272
No match
I was driving in this area during some off and on rainstorms and saw this rainbow right outside of Mitchell, Oregon.
About the photo
Adobe Lightroom.
Canon EOS 7D, Tamron 28-75mm f./2.8 XR Di.
Related wallpapers
More by adairtd
Comments (11)
-
ShutterDazzle
Fairly amazing! I shot a picture of a rainbow, but was as magnificent as this. Great work.
-
Thanks for the comments. I did not do much post processing other than just exporting it to jpeg from lightroom. I was kind of in a hurry when I took that, from the drivers seat of my car as there was no where to pull over right there. If there were a place to pull over I probably would have attached my 17-40L and set up my tripod, unfortunately I did not have an opportunity to do that right then.
-
Xinthose
very beautiful and excellent!! I just love God's creations!
-
Fates Hand
correct me if I'm wrong bmndibb3 but aren't rainbows supposed to band ?
-
bmndibb3
Too much banding in the rainbow, and not the obvious kind.
-
DJKuo629
There's just one thing missing in this photo...Skittles! haha jk This is an amazing photo.
-
Euphytose
Simple, effective, what else?
-
firefly.serenity
I suddenly crave Lucky Charms. Time for breakfast! Excellent submission. As atosk89 said, it must have been absolutely incredible to see live.
-
atosk89
That must have been amazing to see in person. Nice capture. Thanks for sharing it!
-
@josephwm: the sensors on digital cameras do not have the exact same frequency response as the human eye.
-
josephwm
Nice rainbow. On my monitor, I can see a very faint band of colour below the purple which technically shouldn't be there, as it would correspond to a wavelength our eyes couldn't see. Is it an artefact from post-processing, or is it from some in-camera noise caused by re-emission of ultra-violet light? If so, would a UV filter fix this? And do the latitude/longitude coordinates point perhaps to the pot of gold?