Down the Road
- Widescreen 16:10
- 2560x1600
- 2304x1440
- 2048x1280
- 1920x1200
- 1680x1050
- 1440x900
- 1280x800
- 1152x720
- Widescreen 16:9
- 2560x1440
- 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
- 1600x900
- 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
- Dual monitors
- 2560x1024
- Fullscreen 4:3
- 1600x1200
- 1400x1050
- 1280x960
- 1024x768
- Fullscreen 5:4
- 1280x1024
- Netbook
- 1024x600
- 800x480
- iPhone
- 640x960
- 320x480
- iPad
- 1024x1024
- BlackBerry
- 320x240
- Other
- 480x272
No match
Mionica, Serbia is a typical mountain village located close to Kosjerić, 620 meters above sea level. Terrains are full of flower fields, cold springs, thick pine and birch forests.
About the photo
Adobe Photoshop.
Nikon D300, 18-55mm lens.
Related wallpapers
Comments (35)
-
rejectEd
@sabern Brilliant job in screwing up the natural colours. :( Seriously..do your own work and stop messing up others.
-
klahti
I really love the composition of this photo. I've done some field/rural type photos, but where I live it is so flat. The hills add an interesting dimension. I have to agree with what others have said. The HDR is a little harsh. I actually would be interested to see this photo in black and white!
-
sabern
Edit: http://funkyimg.com/u2/349/523/02310_downtheroad_1680x1050Edit.jpg
-
Alex Krycek
Nije lose, konacno da vidim i nesto nase ovde...
-
dano__
Regardless of the various long-winded discussions on the topaz effects and what-not, it gave me a headache seconds after opening it in my browser.
-
rejectEd
"I became too much of a perfectionist during the years." Spare me.
-
firefly.serenity
[Censored], I love this website.
-
brizkit
I see you kicked that nasty Papyrus habit, Igor.
-
jrm125
I think a lot of you need to get over yourselves. The artist took a pic and made it how he wanted it. The community voted it in. You can claim constructive criticism all you want, but I'm reading it as a way of being blow hards and trying to show off a supposedly superior sense of photography. So he used a cheapo 3rd party plugin? Not everyone's a pro. How about everyone let this go and get back to submitting your own stuff instead of railing on the contributions we vote up?
-
@Igor Borisenko Photography: Hi quicksand :-)
-
Igor Borisenko Photography
@ rejectEd ... Trust me I do realize that every software can be tweaked and over tweaked and that's obvious. You missed the whole point though. I would not use a software that advertises those mediocre results and boasts about them. It tells me a lot about the company. Let's face it ... what Topaz product does is no rocket science and I can re-create that same effect in Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop in a few seconds. A few tools come to mind such as fill light and clarity and a few others. Matter of fact results would look much better than what they advertise from their software. It's just disheartening for me to look at the ruined images in the mass media. I became too much of a perfectionist during the years.
-
quicksand, read this one again: "Just because you can do something (and paid a lot for the CS5 versions of the Topaz filters), doesn't mean you should." Why I shudn't? I do what I like to do. Who said I paid for anything, and why it's important? It's up to you to say if you like it or not. And that's all. Love you all. :-D
-
And, quicksand, don't delete your comments becouse I'm trying to answer. Now my answer is pointless, but I won't delete it :-)
-
rejectEd
It's obvious that the Topaz website has put some very dramatic and eye catching images up as samples of their filters at work. There are settings for controlling the amount of processing you add...I can't believe Igor doesn't realize this !
-
Igor Borisenko Photography
@ quicksand ...( Not related to this image directly) Halos, burned sky along with other areas, uneven exposure, flat image = murder. It's simple. Are we talking about the same thing? I am referring to Topaz's website samples. Those samples are like thorns in my eyes. Ahh... I am deeply saddened seeing various software that does not improve images but kills them instead. I am starting to see very poor images in various magazines now. This whole failed HDR look is so yesterday. When I initially ventured into an HDR territory years ago I initially made some mistakes and I was blind to them until one of my Flickr buddies pointed out about the halos and I am thankful to him to this day. If you see halos in the image it is a failure and it's undeniable fact and that's what he told me. I am not the only one that will tell you this. Ask around the pro community. I guess it's fine to live in ignorance if one does not want to improve their photography the choice is personal. All right... my time is up. I just quickly peeked in here... I am very busy as I am typing this. Just wanted to answer your post. Cheers.
-
quicksand
reporting back....this topaz adjust things is pretty neat, real fun to play with, and i can totally see how you to go overboard with it, it's very tempting.
-
Now, beside money, even spelling is important here? Relax quicksand. Have a beauty sleep :-D
-
quicksand
murder?...oh common igor don't be such a drama queen. i've looked at the link you posted and these babies don't look that bad. i'm intrigued and will give it a shot.
-
Igor Borisenko Photography
Reading my comment there is a need for edit button for typos especially when you are in a hurry. I agree with quicksand.
-
Igor Borisenko Photography
Interesting place! Topaz Adjust? Eh... never heard of them but quick Google search and there is it is... the source of image murder. http://www.topazlabs.com/adjust/#4 Just look at those samples and they say a picture is worth a thousand words when perfectly fine images are destroyed in front of your eyes... I call it murder. I don't know anything about the software but results speak for themselves at least from their samples page. I don't have any experience with the software but I don't have any respect for them based on the results that they are boasting about on their website.