Emerald Moraine Lake
- Widescreen 16:10
- 3840x2400
- 3360x2100
- 2880x1800
- 2560x1600
- 2304x1440
- 2048x1280
- 1920x1200
- 1680x1050
- 1440x900
- 1280x800
- 1152x720
- 1024x640
- Widescreen 16:9
- 3840x2160 - 4k UHDTV
- 2880x1620
- 2560x1440
- 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
- 1600x900
- 1366x768
- 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
- Dual monitors
- 2560x1024
- Fullscreen 4:3
- 1600x1200
- 1400x1050
- 1280x960
- 1024x768
- Fullscreen 5:4
- 1280x1024
- Netbook
- 1024x600
- 800x480
- iPhone
- 640x1136
- 640x960
- 320x480
- iPad
- 2048x2048
- 1024x1024
- Android
- 1920x1408
- 1440x1280
- 1080x960
- 960x854
- 960x800
- 600x1024
- BlackBerry
- 360x480
- 320x240
- Windows Phone
- 768x1280
- 720x1280
- 480x800
- Other
- 960x544
- 480x272
- 320x400
No match
Moraine Lake, in the Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada.
About the photo
Adobe Lightroom.
Nikon D4, Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED.
Photo settings: 14 mm, f/9, 1/400 second, ISO 100.
51.3278° N, 116.1806° W (opens Google Maps in a new tab)More by Dave Elysium
Comments (9)
-
Hum ... The D7000 have a better score in the Dynamic range than the D4 on DXO ... @ Frogman ...
-
It's different ... Mine is more lighter than him, the water is also different ... Sinon c'est évident ceux qui préfére la mienne pose sur la mienne et ce qui préfère celle ci va venir ici, car tout est modéré, et tout ce qui est négatif va filter
-
Not the same, it's better here ^^ I'm joking, the other one is my friend's one ;)
-
fearyou
Same like Lady Blue: http://interfacelift.com/wallpaper/details/3029/lady_blue.html How do you explain that?
-
frogman
Awesome picture! Basically it's the combo of D4 and the lens blows the other one away (the price as well, no doubt :)). 3029 is a great picture too, but it feels that the exposure, clarity and shadows were a little bit over boosted. And I agree with Masterbrew, it's a bit over sharpened as well. It's amazing that the D4 has such a wide dynamic range, it preserved the gradient of the sky while the sky was kinda flat in 3029. Good job guys! It's just a very unfair comparison to put 2 pictures on the same page.
-
Masterbrew
Great scene and colours. I like it more than 3029. The processing is more gentle on this one than 3029. 3029 was oversharpened imo, at least for retina displays.
-
Yeah, thanks guys ! Youen California (Picture 3029) & I are friends, and these photos are from the same day ! Our two visions of a same place, at the same moment ;)
-
Tracy
I like 3029, but think this blows it away (though I do agree with InterClaw about the sky). I prefer the colors, and think your composition is superior - there's a "completeness" to this that the other image lacks. I look at 3029 and think "that's a lovely photograph", I look at this and I feel like I could be there. Thank you!
-
InterClaw
Wow... A comparison with 3029 from last week is inevitable. It is a beautiful lake for sure. I think there is at least one more pictures of it here as well. Unfortunately I like pretty much everything else better in 3029. Nicer colors. Prettier sky. Less lens distortion. Arguably better composition (less gravel, thank you). Less human interference.