Passer au contenu
WallpaperLIFT
Orange Days par rekfoto.se

Orange Days, en plein écran

Orange Days par rekfoto.se

  • 2560x1600
  • 2304x1440
  • 2048x1280
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1152x720
  • 2560x1440
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1366x768
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 2560x1024
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 320x480
  • 1024x1024
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

Aucun résultat

Orange Days

Par rekfoto.se

Suivre
Aucun téléchargement
  • 2560x1600
  • 2304x1440
  • 2048x1280
  • 1920x1200
  • 1680x1050
  • 1440x900
  • 1280x800
  • 1152x720
  • 2560x1440
  • 1920x1080 - 1080p HDTV
  • 1366x768
  • 1280x720 - 720p HDTV
  • 2560x1024
  • 1600x1200
  • 1400x1050
  • 1280x960
  • 1024x768
  • 1280x1024
  • 1024x600
  • 800x480
  • 320x480
  • 1024x1024
  • 320x240
  • 480x272

Aucun résultat

I took this in Sweden. The light and colors where really nice.

Ce fond d’écran est décrit en Anglais : les artistes écrivent dans leur propre langue, et nous ne traduisons pas leurs mots.

À propos de la photo

Adobe Photoshop.

Pentax K100D.

Autres fonds d’écran de rekfoto.se

The Fence par rekfoto.se
The Fence
0
Painted Land of Sun par rekfoto.se
Painted Land of Sun
0

Joindre l’artiste

Chargement…

Commentaires (31)

  1. SimonM

    I immediately noticed the artificially produced rays and it turned me off the image...not that I'm against this form of artificial enhancement as it can sometimes be great, but they look just a little too fake. I feel It's much better (and harder) if you can capture a really nice natural set of rays and this photo didn't really need them. Perhaps I wouldn't have felt quite so negatively if you were a little more up front about the work you did to the photo rather than just saying "the light and colours were really nice". It's a tough crowd here at IFL but please keep up the good work and aiming for more submisions!

    Répondre

  2. firefly.serenity

    @Clyde Really? Have you been looking at the same comments for the past couple of years as I have? IFL used to showcase all sorts of submissions, and photography was just one of many types. Nowadays, it seems like the community has pressed very hard for realistic, perfect photographs and nothing more. I want more than photographs for wallpaper on my computer. There, I said it. But to suggest that "nobody here has expressed their desire for total and utter realism" is entirely inaccurate. How many times as the comment "IFL is becoming a photography website" been made? And most of the criticisms about the photography is about the artist deviating too sharply from what the real image was supposed to be or something like that. The lens flare in the print above detracts from the fabulous image? I disagree. In my opinion, it makes the image look like it's from some fantasy world. Perhaps my rant was silly, as you suggest, because I began it by screaming. But to call it unwarranted is wrong. @BROWNCRABS I simply wanted to follow up my "rant" with credibility - frankly, I feel that my position in the museum has simply given me the opportunity to view a great many pieces over the a long period of time. It's unfortunate that people like you speak out when one is trying to have an mature conversation about the submissions here. If you are going to attack my credibility, you should know the difference between a museum and a gallery before doing so.

    Répondre

  3. Clyde

    @ firefly.serenity Your silly rant is totally unwarranted. Nobody here has expressed their desire for total & utter realism and nothing more. All they are saying, and I agree, is that the suns rays are so pronounced that they detract from this fabulous image. That's all. I love this image and if Photoshop or other software can alter it in a way that makes it even better, then fair play and good luck. But in this instance, I can't see that it does improve it.

    Répondre

  4. firefly.serenity

    Aaaaughh! Why does this continue to happen? Please, someone, point out the message on IFL that states that all submissions must be 100% accurate, realistic photos! Where is this language? I guess that in the two years that I have been visiting this website, I have missed it. I echo Jeffrey's comments, as I have made quite clear in other posts - pieces here on IFL do NOT NEED TO BE realistic! This is not a photography website! It's a wallpaper website, and I urge all artists to do whatever they please to their creations to make them unique. This is a fantastic print, and I commend the artist for a job well done. Can we please get over this community-driven requirement for realistic photographs and nothing else? For what it's worth, I am a modern art museum curator in the "real" world. In my professional opinion, I think that this submission is fantastic. So there, bmndibb2.

    Répondre

Réservé aux artistes

S’inscrire Se connecter

Provenant des archives d’InterfaceLIFT

InterfaceLIFT.com était une communauté de fonds d’écran, de 2003 à environ 2018. À sa fermeture, ses fonds d’écran sont restés dans l’Internet Archive (s’ouvre dans un nouvel onglet) public, et celui-ci y a été préservé.

Il est attribué à son artiste d’origine et conserve sa date de publication d’origine.

Vous êtes l’artiste ou le titulaire des droits, et vous ne souhaitez pas qu’il soit ici? Demander son retrait.

Vous êtes l’artiste ou le titulaire des droits, et vous ne souhaitez pas qu’il soit ici? Demander son retrait.

Tailles